------------------------------------
五味谬论:「Of the 848 words (excluding proper names) found in the Pastorals, 306 were never used in the rest of the Pauline epistles.」
回答:正是好证据,证明五味所讲(或抄来的)不是理由!你和我写的东西,一定使用同样的那X个字,X个字都同时出现在我们所有写的东西里???
------------------------------------
五味继续发谬论:「The vocabulary of the Pastorals is more like the language of popular Hellenistic philosophy than the language of Paul. The literary style also betrays the forger. While Paul uses dynamic and emotional Greek, the Pastorals are serene and meditative.」
回答:这更不是证据!!!你和我写的东西,有时安详宁静,有时激动,有时幽默等等。
------------------------------------
五味谬论:「Professor David Trobisch has a suspect in mind for the forgery: Bishop Polycarp of Smyrna. Trobisch says that Polycarp virtually signs his name in II Timothy 4: “The cloak that I left at Troas, with Carpus, when thou comest, bring with thee, and the books, especially the parchments.” The name Carpus, unlike the others in this chapter, never appears in Acts or the earlier letters of Paul. Here, Carpus is said to have Paul’s “cloak”; that is, he had taken on Paul’s mantle. He also had Paul’s writing materials. A later verse mentions a fellow named Crescens, and though he never appears anywhere else in the canonical epistles, a Crescens is mentioned in the Epistle of Polycarp. 」
回答:五味呱呱叫之前,好不好先找出那节经文?
他在讲提摩太后4:13我在特羅亞留於加布的那件外衣,你來的時候可以帶來,那些書也要帶來,更要緊的是那些皮卷。
他说这叫「加布」的人,在使徒行传没有出现过。回答:为什么一定要曾经在使徒行传出现过,保罗才可以提到他呢?什么逻辑???
五味又抱怨「革勒士(Crescens)往加拉太去」也不在圣经任何地方,却在Epistle of Polycarp出现,所以结论说:提摩太后书不是保罗写的。
回答:这是同样的没逻辑的谬论。五味的贴从没有提到XYZ,他突然提到,而另一个人的贴却常常有提到,所以证明五味的贴不是五味写的,是另一个人写的???