1。「But since the his-torical Jesus was a human being, must he not have had flaws, like everyone else? The notion of a flawless human Jesus is a paradoxical oddity in New Testament ethics. 但是由于历史悠久的耶稣是人类,他难道不像其他所有人一样有缺点吗? 完美无瑕的人类耶稣的概念在新约伦理中是悖论性的。」
2。「According to Avalos, it shows that New Testament ethics is still primarily an apologetic enterprise de-spite its claim to rest on critical and historical scholarship. 根据阿瓦罗斯(Avalos)的说法,它表明,尽管新约伦理学主张依靠批判性和历史性奖学金,但仍主要是一个道歉的企业。」
3。「Such topics include Jesus supposedly innovative teachings on love, along with his views on hate, violence, imperialism, animal rights, environmental ethics, Judaism, women, disabled persons and biblical hermeneutics. 这些主题包括耶稣关于爱的创新教义,以及他对仇恨,暴力,帝国主义,动物权利,环境伦理,犹太教,妇女,残疾人和圣经诠释学的看法。」
回答:对啦。耶稣没有错。
4。「 Avalos concludes that current treatments of New Testament ethics are permeated by a religiocentric, ethnocentric and imperialistic orientation. 阿瓦洛斯的结论是,目前对新约伦理的看法渗透到了以宗教为中心,以民族为中心和帝国主义的取向。」
回答:虽然这是作者的偏见。我仍然看没有见耶稣有错。
5。「But if it is to be a credible historical and critical dis-cipline in modern academia, New Testament ethics needs to discover both a Good and a Bad Jesus. 但是,如果要成为现代学术界中可靠的历史和批判学科,新约伦理需要发现好耶稣和坏耶稣。」